Advice and Recommendations

The Pelagic AC provides credible, scientific, and consensus-based advice to inform pelagic fisheries policy, both upon the request of the European Commission and Member States, and on its own initiative. All advice and recommendations are developed and approved by the members of the Pelagic AC. 

Our advice — and responses to it — may be accessed below.

Show Filters
NameSummaryYearDownloads
Principles on banking and borrowing

Two issues relating to the implementation and sustainable use of banking and borrowing provisions provided in the CFP and the way these provisions are integrated in the design of long term management plans and underlying scientific analysis.

2020 Principles on banking and borrowing Commission response
Rebuilding plan for western horse mackerel (WHOM)

The purpose of the Western horse mackerel rebuilding plan is to ensure stock recovery to safe biomass levels and a long-term stock exploitation that is consistent with the precautionary approach and with achieving the objective of maximum sustainable yield (MSY).

2020 Letter to Commission on rebuilding plan for Western horse mackerel Annex I rebuilding plan for Western horse mackerel Letter to Commission about report western horse mackerel focus group on harvest control rule evaluations 2020 Annex I report WHOM FG on harvest control rule evaluations 2020 Commission response
Improvement of the cooperation between EFCA and the Advisory Councils

In response to EFCA’s request to the ACs to contribute with ideas on how to strengthen cooperation and on the development of TOR for the Advisory Board meetings, the Baltic AC and the Pelagic AC have made some comments.

2020 BSAC_and PELAC letter to EFCA on Advisory Board
Advice to ICES on impact of marine wind energy development (by NWWAC, PELAC, NSAC)

The three ACs are pleased with the establishment of the ICES Working Group on Offshore Wind Development and Fisheries (WGOWDF) in 2020. They firmly believe that independent scientific research on the impacts of marine wind energy developments on commercial fish stocks is necessary and timely, as a basis for defining appropriate measures for the protection of essential fishing grounds. The three ACs therefore ask the European Commission to consider the research questions formulated in the recommendation as a basis for a non-recurrent request to ICES, which will support future work of the ACs Ecosystem work in developing advice for the preservation of essential habitats for relevant fish stocks.

In its response, the Commission has indicated that it would be unable to put forward such request to ICES as it was not deemed appropriate for a non-recurrent request. However, the Commission expressed willingness to engage with the three ACs on this topic through an informal meeting, but was constrained by the Brexit negotiations throughout most of 2021. The Pelagic AC will pursue an opportunity in the next financial year to discuss with the Commission and the co-signatory ACs alternative options for increased scientific input.

2020 NWWAC-PELAC-NSAC advice for a non-recurrent request to ICES on the impact of marine wind energy developments on commercial fish stocks Commission response
Call for adjustment of capacity rules CFP to accommodate fair labour

The Pelagic AC supports the Social Dialogue in its prioritization of fair and equitable labour conditions for workers onboard fishing vessels, and its call to align capacity rules of the CFP to accommodate the ratification of international labour standards.

2020 Letter to Europeche on alignment CFP and labour standards
“Maritime sector – a green post-COVID future” Roadmap

In response to Commission consultation for a new approach for a sustainable Blue Economy, the members of the LDAC, MAC, MEDAC, NSAC, NWWAC, and PelAC have joined forces to submit a joint advice. The new approach to a sustainable Blue Economy is shaped by the Commission together with stakeholders and will also be implemented in collaboration. Therefore, the ACs collectively provided input by addressing challenges and opportunities related to the Commission’s new Blue Economy approach based on their relevant expertise in fisheries, aquaculture, seafood processing, trading, and retailing. The sector is highly regulated, and its members persistently strive to address the balance between the three pillars of sustainability through individual, national or trans-national initiatives. The stakeholders of the different ACs look forward to a future opportunity to discuss the new approach to a Blue economy further with the Commission.

2020 Multi-AC advice on the "Maritime sector - a green post-COVID future" Roadma (letter) Multi-AC advice on the “Maritime sector – a green post-COVID future” Roadmap (attachment) Commission response
Deductions in North Sea and Western horse mackerel 2020 TACs

Pelagic AC is surprised and confused about the deductions in TAC applied to North Sea and Western horse mackerel  (for 2020). The landing obligation became effective from the 1st January 2019 for all TACs and quotas species, and demersal discards plans for the North Sea, North Western Waters and South Western Waters contain small quantities of horse mackerel that could be discarded under the de-minimis exemptions.  The Pelagic AC would therefore appreciate further clarification from the Commission on the methodology that was applied for the deductions in the 2020 TACs for North Sea and Western horse mackerel and on the methodology that will continue to be applied in the future.

2020 Deductions in NS and Western horse mackerel 2020 TACs Annex explanatory note Commission response
Release full report evaluation of compliance with the landing obligation mackerel in NS and NWW 2015

Following a joint PelAC-EFCA workshop on the implementation of the landing obligation in March 2020, the PelAC became aware of the publication of a summary of the evaluation of compliance with the landing obligation report for the mackerel fishery, on the EFCA website. This summary makes allegations of non-compliance in the mackerel fishery, the basis of which cannot be verified through the executive summary. To this date, after numerous requests to relevant Member State groups and directly to the agency, EFCA has refused to disclose the full report containing the data and methodology behind the conclusions presented in the summary. The Pelagic AC has escalated this plea to the level of the Commission and asked for the release the report as a matter of urgency – or to ask for the executive summary to be removed from the EFCA website altogether. More generally, the PelAC requested the Commission to work with EFCA to increase transparency in the work of the agency. In addition, the PelAC has put forward a request for disclosure through a Freedom of Information request. Regrettably, the Commission was unable to assist the PelAC in this matter. The Pelagic AC will invite to newly appointed Director of EFCA to a future Executive Committee meeting to further discuss this issue and try to come to a status quo that is acceptable to PelAC members.

2020 Letter to North Sea Member State Group on EFCA compliance evaluation report Letter to North Western Waters Member State Group on EFCA compliance evaluation report Letter to South Western Waters Member State Group on EFCA compliance evaluation report NWW Member State group response NS Member State group response Letter to Commission on follow-up Letter to South Western Waters Member State Group on follow-up SWW Member State group response Commission response (16 February 2021) Commission response (25 February 2021)
Functioning of the Advisory Councils

In light of the letter addressed to the Commission from a number of NGOs, dated 22 July 2020, regarding the ‘Participation of NGOs in Advisory Councils’, the Pelagic AC wished to share on behalf of its members some commentary on the subject of the functioning of the European Advisory Councils. The PelAC acknowledges that the letter to the Commission outlined that even well-functioning Advisory Councils should consider ways in which the best practices already in existence can be further, and more formally, enshrined within procedures and statutes. With this in mind, and having received detailed recommendations from PelAC OIG members, which will be considered by the full membership, the PelAC intends to undertake a third-party performance review of its functioning in 2021. This is an exercise that will be carried out in parallel with the important task of re-defining the PelAC’s future in the post-Brexit landscape – and, as a result, is likely to take place in the second half of the year.

2020 Letter to Commission on functioning of the Advisory Councils
Fishing opportunities for 2021

The Pelagic AC provides recommendations on TACs in 2021 for stocks under its remit.

2020 Fishing opportunities 2021

We use third-party cookies to personalise content and analyse site traffic.

Learn more